DOCTOR FAX

ISSUE 29 15th August 1997

Sourced Compiled and Edited by Paul Blanchard
Medical Advisor - Dr Graeme Moyle , Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

Contents

ANTIVIRALS

The bottleneck in AZT activation

Reports of new research published in the August issues of Nature Medicine and Nature Structural Biology raise questions for people with HIV disease who are considering their treatment options.

New data explains why the reverse transcriptase inhibitor AZT has limited efficacy in suppressing HIV-1 replication.

Before AZT can block viral replication by preventing RNA transcription, the drug must be activated by phosphorylation to the triphosphate form, Dr. Roger S. Goody and colleagues from the Max Planck Institute in Dortmund explain. In their Nature Medicine paper, the researchers report that phosphorylation to the intermediate monophosphate form is uncomplicated, but this provides a poor substrate for the interaction with thymidylate kinase to produce the triphosphate. The net result is a low level of active AZT triphosphate and accumulations of toxic AZT monophosphate.

The two reports represent some "remarkable detective work," according to Dr. George L. Kenyon of the University of California in San Francisco. By using "...enzyme kinetic studies in conjunction with X-ray crystallography in a complementary fashion to implicate an induced movement in the conversion enzyme, thymidylate kinase," they have identified the most likely "...'bottleneck' or limiting step in AZT's activation."

"The inability to achieve a highly effective concentration of AZT [triphosphate] within the cell sufficient to suppress HIV replication invariably leads to resistance selection," add Drs. Daria Hazuda and Lawrence Kuo of Merck Research Laboratories in West Point, Pennsylvania.

Abstract
Nucleoside-based inhibitors of reverse transcriptase were the first drugs to be used in the chemotherapy of AIDS. After entering the cell, these substances are activated to their triphosphate form by cellular kinases, after which they are potent chain terminators for the growing viral DNA. The two main factors limiting their efficacy are probably interrelated. These are the insufficient degree of reduction of viral load at the commencement of treatment and the emergence of resistant variants of the virus. The reason for the relatively poor suppression of viral replication appears to be inefficient metabolic activation. Thus, for the most extensively used drug, 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT), whereas phosphorylation to the monophosphate is facile, the product is a very poor substrate for the next kinase in the cascade, thymidylate kinase. Because of this, although high concentrations of the monophosphate can be reached in the cell, the achievable concentration of the active triphosphate is several orders of magnitude lower. Determination of the structure of thymidylate kinase as a complex with AZT monophosphate (AZTMP) together with studies on the kinetics of its phosphorylation have now led to a detailed understanding of the reasons for and consequences of the poor substrate properties.
Ref: Nat Med 1997;3:836-837,922-924.
Nat Struc Biol 1997;4:595-597,601-604.

ZDV has a number of drawbacks already identified with its use including:

  • haematological toxicity
  • mitochondrial toxicity associated with myopathy
  • increased pathogenicity of ZDV-resistant HIV
  • possible upregulation of reverse transcription by ZDV metabolites leading to reduced effect of any concurrently administered nucleoside analogues

All nucleoside analogues have drawbacks in terms of toxicity and probably in terms of accumulating cellular resistance overtime. However, a second thymidine analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor is licensed in Europe for use in HIV-infected adults - d4T (stavudine) which does not have the above described limiting step in its phosphorylation. This drug has been shown to have equivalent CNS penetration to ZDV and a favourable tolerance and resistance profile. In combination with ddI it has been shown to produce falls in viral load with a durability which is impressive for a double nucleoside analogue combination (see ATP DocFax Issue 16). Studies are also ongoing of d4T with ddI, ddC or 3TC in combination with a variety of protease inhibitors.

A recent report (Rubio et al. AIDS July 97, letters) found 42% of patients presenting for care in Seville, Spain, had a ZDV-resistance mutation at codon 215 suggesting that ZDV may be less effective in these patients than say, a d4T based combination.

Many treatment experts are now advising that d4T be given serious consideration as the thymidine analogue component of initial triple combinations in therapy naive patients.

ZDV and d4T are not to be used in combination due to reduced activity thought to be due to competitive intracellular phosphorylation.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Return to Contents

Measurable HIV viral load on therapy associated with heavy lymph node burden and development of resistance

Highly active antiretroviral therapy can greatly reduce lymph-node HIV levels, but even a short interruption means starting all over again. This sobering finding shows that there are strict limits to even the most effective currently available anti-HIV regimens. HIV infection of the lymph nodes is often spoken of as the central lesion of HIV disease. With the advent of potent combination therapies hopes were raised that HIV might be eliminated or permanently suppressed both in the blood and in the lymphatic tissues.

The good news, announced Joseph K. Wong of the University of California, San Diego, is that HIV in lymphoid tissues is reduced by 4 log10 in patients whose plasma viral loads remain undetectable after a year of therapy. The bad news is that lymph-node HIV levels remain high in patients with relatively low-level plasma viraemia. Perhaps even more disappointing is the finding that lymph-node virus levels rebound back to pre-treatment levels during brief interruptions of therapy.

"Even modest plasma viraemia during therapy can be associated with very significant virus loads in lymphoid tissues," Wong said. "Even temporary interruptions [of therapy] appear to allow for repopulation of lymphoid tissues and the resetting of the clock for the decay of lymph-node virus."

Wong announced the findings in a presentation to "New Opportunities for HIV Therapy - From Discovery to Clinical Proof-of-Concept," the 2nd Joint Conference of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Strategic Program for Innovative Research on AIDS Treatment (SPIRAT) and the National Cooperative Drug Discovery Groups for the Treatment of HIV Infection (NCDDG-HIV), held June 22-26, 1997, in Vienna, Virginia.

Wong and colleagues evaluated HIV RNA and DNA levels and determined resistance mutations in blood and inguinal lymph-node biopsies from patients enrolled in the Merck 035 study comparing indinavir plus zidovudine (AZT) plus lamivudine (3TC) to indinavir alone and to AZT plus 3TC. Nine of the patients examined by Wong et al. received the triple-drug therapy; they had relatively advanced disease with baseline CD4 counts ranging from 69 to 274 cells/(micro)L and a median plasma virus load of 41,100 copies/ml. All had previously received nucleoside therapy, but all were naive for indinavir and 3TC.

"After one year of therapy, viral RNA levels in the lymphoid tissues of individuals receiving triple-drug therapy who had undetectable plasma RNA levels were reduced by 4 log[10] but were still detectable," Wong et al. wrote in their presentation abstract. "However, in subjects on the triple- drug regimen with interruption of therapy or in those treated with AZT/3TC alone, lymphoid viral loads were 10(7) to 10(9) copies of HIV RNA/g of tissue: levels indistinguishable from those expected for untreated patients."

In patients with "suboptimal" response to triple-drug therapy (i.e., measurable plasma virus load), replication- competent virus could be recovered from both blood and lymphoid tissue. And this virus apparently acquires resistance to the treatment medications. "Virus in subjects with inadequate suppression accumulate drug-resistance mutations indicating high levels of virus replication," Wong said. When patients interrupted therapy due to adverse reactions or failure to comply with strict dosage requirements, the virus quickly rebounded in lymphoid tissue.
Source: Aegis.

This data raise further pessimism regarding the likelihood of successful eradication protocols using current triple therapy regimens. Additionally, the presence of continued viral replication in the presence of drug suggests resistance will inevitably develop. Physicians must therefore consider what therapies will be available to their patients as second-line combinations after failure of initial regimens, including those patients who achieve an initial optimal virological response.

More data becoming available also strongly suggests that early failure (ie. before multiple and compensatory mutations accumulate), if detected and acted upon, may enhance the likelihood of continued viral suppression on change of agents.

The importance of adherence and choosing a regimen individualised to the patients needs and capabilities is also underlined by this study. Drug holidays for toxicity or non-adherence may represent a set back for patients in terms of gaining long term (eg immune-restoration) benefits from therapy.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Scientific Advisory Committee of SFAF issue warning statement on saquinavir

Numerous published articles and the development of a new soft-gel capsule formulation of saquinavir by Hoffmann-La Roche raise important issues for people with HIV who are currently taking or considering taking saquinavir (Invirase).

The Scientific Advisory Committee of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation has prepared a summary of information regarding saquinavir formulations and dosing which it has published in its quarterly publication BETA. This information is available on the internet at: http://www.sfaf.org/b33advoc.html

This latest article adds to concerns amongst doctors and patients regarding the antiviral potency of the currently available formula of saquinavir when prescribed at the recommended dose (600mg tid). These concerns culminated in the exclusion of saquinavir from the list of recommended protease inhibitors to include in a first-line triple combination in the recently issued new US DHHS guidelines for antiretroviral therapy (see ATPs Doctor Fax Issue 26).

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Crystalluria and urinary tract abnormalities associated with indinavir.

Background
: Indinavir, a protease inhibitor widely used to treat patients with HIV infection, has been associated with nephrolithiasis. Distinctive urinary crystals and a spectrum of urologic disorders were noted in patients receiving indinavir.

Objective
: To determine the composition of urinary crystals and the frequency of asymptomatic crystalluria and urinary tract symptoms in patients receiving indinavir.

Patients
: Patients with HIV infection who we re enrolled in studies conducted at the National Institutes of Health.

Measurements
: Microscopic urinalysis, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry of urinary crystals and stones, and clinical evaluation of patients with urologic symptoms.

Results
: Of 240 patients receiving indinavir, 142 provided urine specimens for analysis. Twenty-nine (20%) had crystals consisting of plate-like rectangles and fan-shaped or starburst forms. Mass spectrometry and HPLC confirmed that these crystals were composed of indinavir. Of 40 patients who were not receiving indinavir, none had similar crystals (P < 0.001). Nineteen of the 240 patients receiving indinavir (8%) developed urologic symptoms. Of these, 7 (3%) had nephrolithiasis and the other 12 (5%) had previously undescribed syndromes: crystalluria associated with dysuria and crystalluria associated with back or flank pain. Four of the patients with the latter syndrome had radiographic evidence of intrarenal sludging.

Conclusions
: Indinavir forms characteristic crystals in the urine. This crystalluria may be associated with dysuria and urinary frequency, with flank or back pain associated with intrarenal sludging, and with the classic syndrome of renal colic.

Ref: Annals of Internal Medicine 15 July 1997. 127:119-125.

Interestingly the study authors comment that... Five patients had another previously unreported syndrome that consisted primarily of dysuria and urgency with crystalluria. We believe that these symptoms are caused by dense crystalluria that irritates the mucosa of the bladder and urethra. This entity can easily be misdiagnosed as acute infectious urethritis and thus can lead to the unnecessary use of antibiotics.

With regard to management this study reveals that asymptomatic crystalluria was present in 20% of patients receiving indinavir. The appearance of crystalluria was not predictive of the subsequent development of symptoms and is therefore not an indication for withdrawal of indinavir. On the other hand, the presence of crystalluria is confirmatory that the symptoms are probably due to indinavir and suggests the need for increased fluid intake and possibly temporary drug withdrawal.

In conclusion the authors state that of the four currently approved protease inhibitors, indinavir has been the most widely used because of its efficacy, its favourable pharmacologic properties, its tolerability, and the relatively few drug-drug interactions associated with it. These findings do not substantially alter this profile. Symptoms, when they develop, can usually be treated conservatively with hydration and drug withdrawal, and many patients restart indinavir therapy. Nonetheless, it is important that physicians who treat HIV-infected patients with indinavir be aware of the possible spectrum of urologic complications. When symptoms do occur, this information should allow formulation of a narrowed differential diagnosis and development of an appropriate therapeutic plan.

Return to Issue 29 Contents
CURRENT OPINIONS

Is Protease Inhibitor Sequencing Dead?

Data from multiple small mostly non-randomised studies examining use of a second protease inhibitor (PI) after failure on the first choice PI were presented at the recent drug resistance workshop in Florida.

Swanstrom (abstract 13) found that very high in vitro selection pressures, at exposures of drug not achievable in vivo, with saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV) or indinavir (IDV) selected for similar multiple mutation patterns in the protease gene and cross-resistance. This suggests that all PIs have the potential to select for cross- resistant virus. The chances of cross-resistance appear at least somewhat dependent on the number of accumulated mutations. The more mutations present the higher the chance of cross-resistance. The number of accumulated mutations may reflect several issues including;
Theoretically, the shorter time the virus has spent replicating in the presence of drug the lower the chance of multiple mutations having had the chance to accumulate. However, as indinavir and ritonavir share a common resistance pathway (a key active site mutation at codon 82) these agents are always cross-resistant to each other. Mutations accumulating during failing ritonavir therapy first provide changes in viral sensitivity (ie. fitness in presence of drug) and then add mutations which improve the replication capacity of the virus without increasing the extent resistance (fitness in the presence of resistance mutations) (Abstract 92). Indinavir resistant virus, however, appears to possess similar fitness in vitro in the absence of drug compared with wild type (abstract 111), explaining a report from researchers at Merck that a patient with IDV resistance of persistence of mutant virus, albeit at low levels, after interrupting indinavir, which rapidly reappeared after reintroduction of IDV (abstract. 47). These researchers found genotypic markers of resistance to IDV, such as presence of mutations at codons 82 or 46, were better predictors of virological response, or non-response, than phenotypic assessment. Tang demonstrated that virus with G48V, L9OM and both mutations is less fit than the wild type virus therefore less likely to propagate (Abstract 14) a probable explanation as to why resistance to saquinavir has been reported to arise slowly in vivo.

Response to second agents in PI experienced patients


Data on sequencing protease inhibitors remain limited and suggest that whilst cross resistance may be selected by all compounds, some agents have a greater chance of attenuating response to a second PI than others. In ACTG 333. the first study to report use of IDV after a median 112 weeks of saquinavir, reduction in viral load at week ?? was only 0. 58 log; lower than would be expected from IDV alone in a PI naive person (around 1 log). However, 43% of patients went undetectable (<200 copies/rnl) with indinavir, a similar proportion to that seen in studies of IDV monotherapy. This makes interpretation of the data difficult. Importantly, in this study only the PI was switched. Authorities such as the BHIVA (British HIV Association) recommend the switching of at least 2 agents at the time of therapy modification.

Clavel (abstract 16) found 10/22 responders after switching to indinavir with HIV-RNA levels 3.5 log (or undetectable) and 12/22 non responders amongst patients with an average 9 month on SQV therapy, whose VL had returned to baseline. The presence of the L9OM mutation selected by SQV appeared to prevent the appearance of the indinavir codon 82 mutation. Additionally, typical SQV mutations at codons 90 and 48 were observed to arise in the presence of IDV, possibly selected out from minority subpopulations pre-selected by SQV. Patients with >10-fold changes in sensitivity to SQV were less likely to respond to the addition of IDV. However, virus selected for by SQV showed 3-fold or less changes to IDV. Subsequent IDV therapy resulted in high level SQV resistance with progressive evolution of indinavir resistance.

Winters (abstract 17) found 58% of patients had codon 48 or 90 mutations after 1-2 years of SQV mostly on monotherapy, with 35% having mutations reported with other PIs (at codons 36, 46, 82 and 84). The G48V mutation was more common in patients receiving high dose SQV, and generally associated with the V82A mutation typical of RTV/IDV resistance. The presence of L9OM again appeared to alter the mutation pathways observed with subsequent nelfinavir (NFV) or IDV therapy with mutations at codons 36 and 46 but not 30 (for NFV) or 82 (for IDV) being observed. Prior SQV therapy was associated with cross-resistance to NFV or IDV in some patients but was more widely observed after the second agent. These data suggest that switching from SQV in persons with L9OM may preserve treatment options but that some mutations may result in cross-resistance.

Eastman (abstract 30) found mutations at codons 48 or 90 were temporally associated with SQV failure (i.e. loss of virological control). The L9OM predominated as the first mutation in these persons receiving SQV HGC 600mg tid with ddC in the NV14256 clinical endpoint study. As L9OM was not associated with cross-resistance to other compounds he suggested that switching at the first evidence of SQV failure is likely to maintain treatment options whereas continued selection by SQV may lead to an increased chance of cross-resistance mutations arising. A similar hypothesis was raised by Schapiro who suggested that if patients switch early after treatment on SQV they are likely to benefit from other PIs while remaining on an incompletely suppressive regimen will select for multiple mutations increasing the chance of generating cross-resisiance to other PIs (Abstract 87).

SQV experienced patients may respond to some second line PIs better then others

In 16 patients switching after a mean 11 months SQV to NFV (some of whom also switched NAs), 11 achieved VL reductions of >O.5 log (3 patients to <400 copies/ml) but only 2 patients remained undetectable to week 16. Subsequent switch to indinavir plus nevirapine (continuing NAS) resulted in a mean VL reduction at week 8 of 1.58 log; with 6/10 patients achieving <400 (abstract 64). Similarly 10 patients completing >24 weeks SQV at high dose (3600 or 7200 mg/day) switched to IDV (monotherapy for 4 weeks then with ZDV/3TC) achieved a mean week 4 VL reduction of 1 21log increasing to 1.94log at week 24 (after addition of NAS). These responses were despite presence of multiple resistance associated mutations including at L9OM and G48V (abstract 87). Twelve patients with a median 4.9 years SQV exposure adding RTV (500mg BD) achieved transient VL, reductions (1.52, 0.97 and 0.03 at weeks 2, 4, and 16). Patients with no baseline SQV mutations achieved greater and more sustained responses (2log at week 16) (abstract 84). Thus there may be an association with duration of failure and chance of responding to a second agent.

Anyone with detectable virus on SQV, or indeed any PI, should consider immediate therapy modification to limit the chance of selection of cross-resistant virus.

Other PIs

With nelfinavir (NFV) (abstract 18) in vitro cross-resistance appears rare in the presence of the typical codon D3ON mutation (based on 6 clinical isolates) with isolates obtained from 170 NFV treated patients (up to 52 weeks) not having mutations at codons 48, 82, 84 and only rarely 90. Isolates from persons failed on one of the 3 other PIs showed 59% retained sensitivity to NFV. However, data presented found that in 64 patients with 1 prior PI 61% did not achieve a >0.5log reduction on switching to nelfinavir.

In 19 patients with a mean 5.2 months prior indinavir or ritonavir use experienced a mean 1.6log reduction in VL at one month when treated with combination therapy including the SQV-RTV double PI combination. Unfortunately, responses had returned to baseline by month 2 suggesting the benefits of this highly active combination may be limited by prior therapy with some PIs (abstract 76). Similarly, of twenty indinavir failures switched to SQV/RTV (plus other agents in some cases) only 6 patients (35%) achieved a 1log VL drop at week 4. Failure of response was associated with extensive cross-resistance selected for by indinavir therapy (abstract 81). This suggests a lower rate of responses to second line therapy following indinavir, consistent with in vitro resistance data.

Ultimately, cross-resistance appears possible with all PIs. Initial therapy with a PI should not involve a compromise in terms of activity but should involve close monitoring of VL to prompt immediate therapy modification upon either an inadequate response or return to detectable virus.
Author: Graeme Moyle.
It is becoming increasingly clear that inadequate response or virological failure whilst receiving a protease inhibitor containing regimen is highly undesirable both in terms of current health status and foreclosure of options for future treatment.

Genotypic and phenotypic testing is still only available as a research tool with results difficult to interpret. The question that must, therefore, be urgently addressed is how are clinicians to detect the emergence of resistance in a timely fashion in patients currently receiving protease inhibitors?

It is widely accepted that continued viral replication (ie. detectable viral load) whilst on treatment is the driving force for genetic resistance to antiretroviral drugs. It is also clear that even though viral load may be below the level of detection of current assays, viral evolution is still ongoing. It is biologically plausible, with evidence from studies now emerging, that the lower the viral load (even when below detectable) the slower the emergence of resistance and the longer the durability of action of currently available antiretroviral agents.

It therefore follows that close and frequent monitoring of plasma viral load for patients receiving antiretrovirals (particularly protease inhibitors) is essential to early detection of resistance and prediction of therapeutic failure. HIV emerging after early escape from drug pressure is likely to be attenuated, have perhaps 1 mutation and limited cross-resistance. If therapy is not modified quickly at this stage accessory mutations will accumulate, viral fitness will recover and cross-resistance is likely to be wide. Both physician and patient will then find themselves in an unenviable position.

A viral load monitoring programme to detect early failure in an attempt to prevent cross-resistance would require;

  • an initial assessment soon after initiation of therapy (say 4 weeks) to ensure that there is some antiviral activity in the individual (ie. VL drop 1.0log)

  • frequent and continued VL monitoring in individuals on therapy at say 1-2 month intervals with results available in real time to ensure the nadir reached is both acceptable (as low as can be achieved in the individual circumstances) and is being maintained.

This schedule would ensure that emergent virus has no more than 4-8 weeks in which to consolidate its resistance and cross-resistance.

It is clear that UK treatment centres are yet to take the issue of drug resistant HIV seriously. Many centres will only allow VL tests to be done 2-3 times yearly, even for patients on protease inhibitors. Furthermore, once blood is drawn, the assay is not carried out and results available for up to 8 weeks. Even so-called centres-of-excellence in London have a six week turnaround for viral load results. In the face of the current evidence, and with no studies suggesting that such infrequent VL testing is benign, clinicians must question the wisdom of their current practice which may give emergent HIV as long as 6 months further replication before it comes to the attention of both patient and physician.

On the currently available evidence, it appears that viral load monitoring policies in the UK may foster widespread failure to current drug regimens and the subsequent emergence of multidrug resistant HIV.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

PATHOGENESIS

Very few HIV-positive patients are true long-term nonprogressors

Using stringent criteria based on all known predictors of disease progression, French researchers believe that very few HIV-positive individuals are true long-term nonprogressors (LTNPs). In a study, which is published in the 1st August issue of Blood, they found that the majority of individuals termed as LTNPs "...present biological signs of HIV disease progression."

Abstract:

Even Individuals Considered as Long-Term Nonprogressors Show Biological Signs of Progression After 10 Years of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.

Despite a decade of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity, a few individuals termed as long-term nonprogressors (LTNPs) maintain a stable CD4+ T-cell count for a period of time. The aim of this study was to establish, through the sequential determination of all known predictors of HIV disease, the proportion of such patients having stringent criteria of true long-term nonprogression. Among 249 individuals who were HIV-infected and prospectively followed up over a 10-year period (1985 to 1995), 12 having a CD4+ T-cell count greater than 500/mL (LTNP I group) and 9 having a CD4+ T-cell count less than 500 but stable over time (LTNP II group) after at least 10 years of infection without intervention of antiviral therapy, were studied over the entire follow-up period. The plasma HIV RNA copy number and the serum concentrations of p24 antigen, each anti-HIV antibody, neopterin, beta-2-microglobulin, Immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA were determined every 18 months over the study period. Cellular and plasma viraemias were cross-sectionaly assayed in all 21 patients. Only two patients had strictly no marker of progression over the follow-up period. They were the only ones who had, over the 10-year period, a viral copy number too low to be detected. The other patients had a viral copy number higher than 400/mL at at least one visit and increasing over the follow-up period, and they evidenced one or more markers of virological or immunological deterioration. Cellular viraemia was positive in all patients but two, while plasma viraemia was negative in all but one. The population of individuals termed as LTNPs is not virologically and immunologically homogeneous. The majority present biological signs of HIV disease progression. A new pattern of true LTNP can be drawn through stringent criteria based on the whole known predictors. This pattern appears to be rare in HIV-positive population.
Ref: Blood 1997;90:1133-1140.

Whilst the majority of persons infected with HIV will progress at some point, it remains to be determined when treatment should start. Whilst it is biologically plausible to start early with therapy many of the slow progressors may experience drug related toxicity prior to when risk of symptoms would have begun. Slow progressors, who have not become immunodeficient after 10 to 15 years of follow-up may continue to have detectable viral load. Consideration of the duration of treatment and impact of treatment on quality of life should be made prior to starting treatment in LTNPs with detectable viral load.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Two new HIV-1 co-receptors discovered

New research published in the journal Nature suggests that HIV invades human cells on several fronts and that future AIDS treatment must be designed to block multiple pathways. Researchers from New York University Medical Center found that human immune system cells have two previously undiscovered receptors that HIV can latch onto to penetrate the cells.

To infect a cell, the human and simian immunodeficiency viruses have to attach to its membrane, then enter the cell, before subverting the genetic machinery to their own ends. The CD4 membrane receptor has long been known to be essential, but not sufficient, for this process. Eighteen months ago, the first so-called co-receptor was discovered. More have since been identified, and the latest tally for HIV-1 is six. The possibilities thereby opened up for developing drugs that compete with the virus for these binding sites is counterbalanced by the prospect of viral evolution to use alternative co-receptors.
Ref: Nature 388, 230-231 (1997)
Nature 388, 296 (1997)

These data suggest CCR5 or CXCR4 blockers, currently in concept or phase 0 development are unlikely to work in vivo as HIV has multiple pathways to enter cells.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

OPPORTUNISTIC ILLNES

Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

New research indicates that for initial treatment of AIDS-related cryptococcal meningitis, the use of higher-dose amphotericin B and flucytosine is associated with a greater rate of cerebrospinal fluid sterilisation and lower mortality than other drugs. Researchers for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group studied more than 300 patients who were experiencing their first episode of AIDS-related cryptococcal meningitis. After two weeks, 60 percent of those patients receiving amphotericin B plus flucytosine and 51 percent of the amphotericin-only group had negative cerebrospinal fluid cultures. During the second phase, researchers administered itraconoazole or fluconazole for eight weeks. Some 72 percent of those receiving fluconazole and 60 percent of those receiving itraconazole had negative cultures after 10 weeks. Moreover, the proportion of patients who had clinical responses was similar with the two drugs. A multivariate analysis found that the addition of flucytosine during the first phase and treatment with fluconazole during the second phase was independently associated with cerebrospinal fluid sterilisation. The researchers also noted that itraconazole can be substituted for patients unable to take fluconazole.
Ref: New England Journal of Medicine (07/03/97) Vol. 337, No. 1, P.15
Source: AIDS Daily Summaries

Amphotericin with or without flucytosine (depending on clinic) is the standard of care for patients with moderate or severe cryptococcal meningitis. These data suggest inclusion of flucytosine should become the standard of care. In mild meningitis oral fluconazole may be used.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Increased risk of anal cancer in HIV-infected individuals

At the National (US) Lesbian and Gay Health Conference in Atlanta, researcher Joel Palefsky warned of the increased risk of anal cancer faced by people living with HIV, predicting that the incidence of this type of cancer is likely to rise over the next five years.

According to Doctor Palefsky, men and women who engage in anal intercourse run the greatest risk of contracting a strain of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) that can lead to cancer. Among those living with HIV, the risk is greater still, particularly as their immune system weakens over time.

Among 600 subjects of a study conducted at the University of California in San Francisco, 75% of men with severe immune suppression had pre-cancerous anal dysplasia at the start of the study, compared to 20% among HIV- men. Four years later, the condition of twice as many immunosuppressed men had worsened compared to the HIV- subjects. Furthermore, a second study revealed that antiviral treatment that had led to an increase in CD4+ numbers had no effect on the abnormal cells observed.

In light of these findings, and given that anal cancer usually takes several years to develop, Dr. Palefsky has suggested that the number of cases of anal cancer will rise sharply in coming years as new treatments offer hope of a longer life to many patients. To help counter this potential threat, Dr. Michael Berry of UCSF recommends regular anal Pap smears and colposcopic examinations for all gay and bisexual men living with HIV, as well as HIV- negative men and women who have engaged in anal intercourse. As treatment, Dr. Berry recommends the surgical removal of lesions by fulguration or electrotherapy.
Source: CATIE-News

An increased incidence of anal cancer has been previously reported in HIV infected men (together with a range of other malignancies). Colposcopy or smears have not been recommended or widely used in the UK as a low proportion of dysplastic lesions subsequently progressed to cancer (compared to cervical lesions in women, particularly HIV-infected) and physicians were uncertain how to treat - laser therapy or electrotherapy may need to be extensive, cause both short and long term anal problems and may not cure lesions. This study suggests a role for piloting anal colposcopy to assess its value in prevention of anal cancer amongst individuals at highest risk.

Return to Issue 29 Contents

Isolation and identification of haematopoietic stem cell-stimulating substances from kampo (Japanese herbal) medicine, Juzen-Taiho-To

Abstract:

We have previously found that TJ-48 has the capacity to accelerate recovery from haematopoietic injury induced by radiation and the anti-cancer drug mitomycin C (MMC). The effects are found to be due to its stimulation of spleen colony-forming unit (CFU-S) counts on day 14. In the present study, we attempt to isolate and purify the active components in TJ-48 extracts using a new in vitro haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) assay method. n-Hexane extract from TJ-48 shows a significant stimulatory activity. The extract is further fractionated by silica gel chromatography and HPLC in order to identify its active components. 1H-NMR and GC-EIMS indicate that the active fraction is composed of free fatty acids (oleic acid and linolenic acid). When 27 kinds of free fatty acids (commercially available) are tested using the HSC proliferating assay, oleic acid, elaidic acid, and linolenic acid are found to have potent activity. The administration of oleic acid to MMC-treated mice enhances CFU-S counts on days 8 and 14 to twice the control group. These findings strongly suggest that fatty acids contained in TJ-48 actively promote the proliferation of HSCs. Although many mechanisms seem to be involved in the stimulation of HSC proliferation, we speculate that at least one of the signals is mediated by stromal cells, rather than any direct interaction with the HSCs.
Ref: Blood, Aug 1st 1997, Vol 90, No.3. 1022-31.

TJ-48 is also known as minor bupleurum combination, sho-saiko-to and xiao chaihu tang. It is a combination of seven chinese herbs in strict ratio (bupleurum, scutellaria, ginseng, pinellia tuber, licorice, ginger and jujube dates). It has also been shown to have immunomodulating and antiretroviral activity in vitro.

This study identifies its haematopoietic stem cell stimulating activity to be due to its content of essential fatty acids. Linolenic acid is also found in dietary sources such as nuts, oily fish, flaxseed and evening primrose oil.

Zidovudine use can be associated with haematological problems particularly anaemia due to bone marrow toxicity. Some patients on ZDV who develop anaemia may have to reduce the dose or stop the drug. Alternatively recombinant erythropoietin may be used to stimulate red blood cell production. This preliminary research suggests that supplementation with these essential fatty acids might be tried as a low-cost strategy to prevent or reverse anaemia in patients receiving ZDV.

Evening primrose and flaxseed oil supplements are readily available at chemists.

Return to Issue 29 Contents