DOCTOR FAX

ISSUE 9 18th October 1996

Sourced Compiled and Edited by Paul Blanchard
Medical Advisor - Dr Graeme Moyle, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

Contents



ANTIVIRALS




Indinavir and Saquinavir Receive Final Authorisation for Marketing in Europe

On 4th October 1996, the European Commission announced the approval of two HIV protease inhibitor drugs, indinavir (Crixivan, Merck and Co.) and saquinavir (Invirase, Hoffman-La Roche).

INSERT INDICATIONS

INSERT AVAILABILITY DATES

Comments: With ritonavir brings to three the number of PIs now licensed in the UK. Guidance for physicians in choice of agent?


Return to Contents

Double Combination Nucleoside Analogue Trial Results Published - ACTG 175 and CPCRA 007

Papers detailing the results of two large-scale HIV treatment studies, supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and an accompanying editorial, were published in the Oct. 10, 1996 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.

Preliminary results of the two studies, known as ACTG 175 and CPCRA 007, were first announced by NIAID in 1995, and have played an important role in helping define the standard of care for HIV-infected people and shaping subsequent clinical studies of antiretroviral medications.

"ACTG 175 was noteworthy because it was the first trial to provide conclusive evidence that antiretroviral therapy could reduce the risk of death in people with intermediate-stage HIV disease and no symptoms, and CPCRA 007 provided important information on combination therapy for HIV-infected people with more advanced disease," says Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., NIAID director. "Both ACTG 175 and CPCRA 007, in addition to other recent studies, underscore the importance of careful planning in the use of antiretroviral drugs since prior antiretroviral experience can profoundly influence the effectiveness of some treatments."

"Subsequent to these two studies, results from other trials, especially those that have assessed protease inhibitors in combination with other drugs, have provided impressive results, giving hope for a level of control of HIV disease that has thus far eluded patients and physicians," he adds.

ACTG 175 was conducted at 43 sites of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group and nine sites of the National Haemophilia Foundation. The study investigators analysed data from 2,467 patients with initial CD4+ T cell counts between 200 and 500 per cubic millimetre (mm3) of blood. Fifty-seven percent of these patients had previously received anti-HIV therapy; most had no HIV-related symptoms at study entry.

Patients in ACTG 175 received one of four anti-HIV treatment regimens: zidovudine (AZT) alone; AZT plus didanosine (ddI); AZT plus zalcitabine (ddC); or ddI alone. They were followed for a median of 143 weeks.

In their analyses of the study results, ACTG 175 investigators found that ddI alone, the AZT+ddI combination, and the AZT+ddC combination were each superior to AZT alone in preventing one or more of the serious consequences of HIV infection: significantly declining CD4+ T cell counts, a new AIDS-defining condition (e.g., Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia) or death.

When the investigators looked only at the clinical endpoints of a new AIDS-defining condition or death, treatment with either AZT+ddI or ddI alone was more effective than AZT alone. In the analysis of clinical endpoints, the benefit of AZT+ddC over AZT alone appeared to be limited to volunteers without prior antiretroviral treatment.

In the study, there were no major differences in the toxicitys associated with the four treatments.

CPCRA 007 was conducted at sites that are part of the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS; it is also known as the "NuCombo" study.

This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of combination therapy -- AZT+ddI or AZT+ddC -- as compared to AZT alone in 1,102 HIV-infected people who had fewer than 200 CD4+ T cells/mm3 of blood at study entry or who previously had suffered an AIDS- defining condition. Seventy-seven percent of the patients who enrolled in CPCRA 007 had received prior antiretroviral therapy.

Over a median follow-up time of 35 months, combination therapy (AZT+ddI or AZT+ddC) provided only marginal benefits, which were not statistically significant, in slowing progression of clinical disease and reducing the rate of death as compared to AZT alone. In addition, toxicitys were more frequent in the two combination groups than among patients taking AZT alone.

However, in subgroup analyses of patients with little or no prior AZT use, combination therapy was more effective than AZT alone in terms of slowing disease progression to AIDS or death. Use of combination therapy provided no additional benefit to patients who
had previously used AZT for more than 12 months.


Ref: New England Journal of Medicine 1996;15:1081- 1090, 1091-1098, 1099-1106, 1142-1144.

Comments: Where do these results stand in relation to Delta?, CPCRA 007 - recommendations for prescribing in advanced disease?


Return to Contents

Further Evidence that Reductions in HIV Viral Load subsequent to antiretroviral treatment are Predictive of Reduced Risk of Disease Progression Independent of CD4 Count.


Plasma HIV RNA concentration (viral load) is increasingly being used as a measure of viral activity in HIV-infected individuals both for prognostic purposes and to guide therapeutic decision making. Mellors et al. observed in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) that the risk of AIDS and death was strongly associated with increased plasma HIV RNA concentrations. It has, however, been unclear whether reducing plasma HIV RNA levels through the use of antiretroviral drugs would correlate with an improved prognosis.

A virology substudy of the ACTG 175 trial published in The New England Journal of Medicine ...found a significant association between a reduction in the plasma HIV RNA concentration after the initiation of therapy with antiretroviral drugs and a reduction in the risk of AIDS and death, but there was less evidence that changes in the CD4 cell count in response to drug therapy provided a useful indication of the risk of clinical progression.

Abstract

Background. We studied measures of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, the viral phenotype, and immune function (CD4 cell counts) and the relation of changes in these indicators to clinical outcomes in a subgroup of patients in a controlled trial of early antiretroviral treatment for HIV, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175.

Methods. The 391 subjects, each of whom entered the study with a single screening CD4 cell count of 200 to 500 per cubic millimetre, were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine alone, didanosine alone, zidovudine plus didanosine, or zidovudine plus zalcitabine. Plasma concentrations of HIV RNA were assessed in 366 subjects, and viral isolates from 332 subjects were assayed for the presence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype.

Results. After eight weeks, the mean (+/-SE) decrease from base line in the concentration of HIV RNA, expressed as the change in the base 10 log of the number of copies per millilitre, was 0.26+/-0.06 for patients treated with zidovudine alone, 0.65+/-0.07 for didanosine alone, 0.93+/-0.10 for zidovudine plus didanosine, and 0.89+/-0.06 for zidovudine plus zalcitabine (P<0.001 for each of the pairwise comparisons with zidovudine alone). Multivariate proportional-hazards models showed that higher base-line concentrations of plasma HIV RNA, less suppression of plasma HIV RNA by treatment, and the presence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype were significantly associated with an increased risk of progression to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and death. After adjustment for these measures of viral replication and for the viral phenotype, CD4 cell counts were not significant predictors of clinical outcome.

Conclusions. Both the risk of the progression of HIV disease and the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy are strongly associated with the plasma level of HIV RNA and with the viral phenotype. The changes in the plasma concentration of HIV RNA predict the changes in CD4 cell counts and survival after treatment with reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.

Ref: N Engl J Med 1996;335:1091-8.


Comments: Delta virology substudy? Observations limited to patients treated with ZDV, ddI and ddC. Much larger decreases in viral load are seen with combinations including a protease inhibitor. Will these combinations also show decreases in rates of disease progression proportional to the viral suppression achieved?



Return to Contents

Nevirapine and Protease Inhibitors


Responding to pressure from activists, on September 23, 1996, Boehringer Ingelheim and its subsidiary, Roxane Laboratories sent a letter to US physicians stating that its anti-HIV drug, nevirapine (Viramune), reduces the amount of the protease inhibitor saquinavir if the two drugs are used together. Nevirapine was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this spring, and is the first in a new class of anti-HIV drugs, called non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), to be approved in the US.

The letter notifies physicians that use of nevirapine with the protease inhibitor saquinavir (Invirase, Hoffman LaRoche's protease inhibitor) in HIV-infected volunteers led to an average 27% decrease in plasma saquinavir levels. The company states that the decrease, while statistically significant, is not cause for concern. ACT UP/Golden Gate noted that most physicians and treatment advocates consider the approved dose of saquinavir to already be sub-optimal and that further decreases are likely to make the drug even less effective. Concern over the low saquinavir blood levels that occur with the current dose and formulation may lead to resistance has led many physicians to recommend that patients take double the approved dose while the company urgently attempts to develop a new formulation. The letter also states that results of interaction studies of nevirapine with two other protease inhibitors, indinavir (Crixivan) and ritonavir (Norvir) will be available by the end of the year, five months earlier than suggested by company officials in August.

The full text of this letter is reproduced below:


September 23,1996

Dear Doctor:

As a reminder, nevirapine (VIRAMUNE(R)) has been approved by the U.S. FDA for use in combination with nucleoside analogues for the treatment of HIV-1 infected adults who have experienced clinical and/or immunologic deterioration. The use of nevirapine in combination with protease inhibitors is not currently recommended by Roxane Laboratories, Inc. in the package insert and is still considered investigational. We would like to update you on the current status of ongoing pharmacokinetic interaction trials with nevirapine and the protease inhibitors saquinavir, indinavir and ritonavir because of the interest by many in determining any interaction potential.

Nevirapine is a mild-to-moderate inducer of the hepatic enzyme CYP3A and the potential exists to reduce plasma levels of other drugs metabolized by this pathway, including the protease inhibitors. It is also possible that nevirapine plasma levels may be affected by concomitant use with other drugs that utilize the same pathway.

Preliminary date from the nevirapine/saquinavir interaction trial are provided below; data from the nevirapine/indinavir and nevirapine/ritonavir interaction trials will be available by the end of this year.

Saquinavir and Nevirapine

An open label, sequential administration study is being jointly supported by Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, lnc. The trial requires enrolment of 24 evaluable HIV-infected patients who will receive saquinavir (SQV; currently approved formulation) for seven days followed by nevirapine (NVP) in the recommended dose escalation method for 28 days, followed by the combination of SQV+NVP for seven days. A summary of the regimens is shown below.

Summary of Periods and Regimens

Period

Regimen

1

SQV 600mg tid for 7 days

2

NVP 200mg qd for 14 days then 200mg bid for 14 days

3

SQV 600mg tid + NVP bid for 7 days

Preliminary Results



A summary of the patient enrolment status is shown below:

Disposition

Number Patients

Enrolled 31
Completed 21
Evaluable 20
Currently ongoing 4
Withdrawn prior to completion 6


The preliminary analysis on the first 11 patients in this ongoing trial was presented at the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee meeting in June, 1996 in order to allow some understanding of what might be expected in terms of any pharmacokinetic interaction. At that time, a mean reduction of 16-17% in SOV levels was observed. A total of 31 patients have been enrolled into the study. A preliminary analysis has now been completed for 21 patients who have paired SQV data available for periods 1 and 3. The preliminary results indicate that the coadministration of NVP and SQV leads to a modest 27% decrease in SQV AUC. The decrease in AUC (p=0.03) was statistically significant. However, the protocol stipulates that a 50% decrease in SQV AUC should be regarded as clinically relevant. There was a negligible (3%) decrease in NVP concentrations. Consequently it does not appear that these decreases observed would warrant a change in dosing of either drug at this time if they were to be used in combination.

It should be emphasized that these data have not yet been subjected to strict quality control procedures and not all patients have completed the study. However, we wanted to disseminate this information as soon as it was available to us.

Safety:

In general the combination of SQV+NVP has thus far been well tolerated. Of the patients completed (21) plus withdrawn (6), two patients [7% (2/27)] discontinued due to a rash that was attributed to NVP. A third patient was withdrawn due to a rash while on SQV alone. All rashes resolved after discontinuation of study medication. The other three withdrawals were due to: LFT elevation while on NVP., patient developed PCP, patient self withdrew.

Comments:

A clinically significant alteration is generally one which would require some type of intervention, such as a change in dose. Generally, dose adjustments in anti-infective agents are not required unless more than a 50% alteration in drug exposure occurs from a drug interaction since the dose-effect curves are not sensitive to small changes. The effect of NVP on SQV AUC (-27%) is relatively modest when compared to the effects of other CYP3A inducers.

The 7% discontinuation rate due to NVP-associated rash observed in this trial thus far is similar to the rate which has been observed in other NVP clinical trials (7%)- A full assessment of adverse events in this trial is pending.

Indinavir and Nevirapine

A study sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of 24 HIV-infected adults (14 evaluable patients required), to investigate the potential interaction of indinavir 800 mg tid with nevirapine 200 mg bid was clinically completed on September 14, 1996 (last patient, last dose). The preliminary results of this study are anticipated to be available in early November, 1996.

Ritonavir and Nevirapine

A study sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of 24 HIV-infected adults (12 evaluable patients required) to investigate the potential interaction of ritonavir 600 mg bid with nevirapine 200 mg bid is ongoing and is anticipated to be clinically completed on October 17, 1996 (last patient, last dose). The preliminary results of this study are anticipated to be available in early December, 1996.

We will continue to update you as new information becomes available to assist with your ability to make informed decisions about treatment options for your
patients.

Sincerely,

Maureen W. Myers, Ph.D.
Clinical Virology Program Director


Comments: Nevirapine in the UK, still no expanded access? -27% AUC of SQV is this really insignificant? Given the clear dose-response relation should PIs be seen as other anti-infective agents where a 50% reduction before significance is the rule?

Delarvidine interaction data clearly more favourable for a combination including SQV?


Return to Contents

HIV Blocked by Chemokine Antagonist


Recent research has shown that HIV-1 depends on chemokine receptors to act as cell surface co-receptors to enter and infect cells. Scientists from the Pasteur Institute, the University of British Columbia, and the University of Bern report that a modified version of the chemokine RANTES can block HIV-1 without prompting the adverse effects the original compound causes. The findings suggest that "receptor signalling and cell activation is probably not required for the anti-HIV effect of chemokines," and that therapeutic agents could be developed as a result, the authors conclude.

Ref: Nature (10/03/96) Vol. 383, No. 6599, P. 400

Comments?????


Return to Contents

PATHOGENESIS




"Genetic Restriction of HIV-1 Infection and Progression to AIDS b a Deletion Allele of the CKR5 Structural Gene"


Recent research has shown that the chemokine receptor CKR5 serves s a critical co-receptor for certain strains of HIV-1. Further studies have suggested that a defect in co-receptors may protect some individuals from HIV-1 infection. Stephen J. O'Brien, of he National Cancer Institute, and colleagues, mapped the location of the CKR5 structural gene and determined the frequency of the defect in the population. From a total of 1,955 patients at high risk for HIV, who were involved in large AIDS studies, 17 people, who had all been exposed to HIV-1 but tested negative for viral antibodies, were found to have two copies of the defective gene. In individuals who had survived with HIV for more than 10 years, the presence of one copy of the defective gene was much more common. An analysis of the frequency of the defect and survival time showed that disease progression is slower in people with one copy of the defective gene than in individuals without the defect.

Dr. O'Brien believes these findings have clear clinical implications. "Now that we are beginning to see the benefits of attacking HIV with, not one, but a combination of different drugs, today's finding points out a different, but naturally proven, angle from which to attack the virus and make its life really rough," he writes.

In an accompanying editorial, Jon Cohen points out some "notable differences" between the current findings and previous reports. "O'Brien found no indications that heterozygotes were protected against HIV infection: There were roughly the same number of heterozygotes was found in both infected (15%) and uninfected (14%) populations." However, Dr. O'Brien's group does provide some evidence, "...that having one mutant [CKR5] gene copy might slow the progression of AIDS," Cohen wrote.

"Many AIDS researchers are now interested in investigating whether these findings can be translated into treatments or vaccines that delay or prevent disease," he continues. But other researchers urge caution, pointing out that "...chemokines and their receptors are part of a vast, delicately controlled immunologic network."

Ref: Science (09/27/96) Vol. 273, No. 5283, P. 1856; Dean, Michael; Carrington, Mary; Winkler, Cheryl; et al.

Comments?????


Return to Contents

"A New Focus on Primary HIV Infection"



The initial period of HIV infection is thought to be an important time for treatment--to possibly improve a patient's survival, or to eradicate the virus completely. Recent research suggests that HIV production stabilises after primary infection, and that if replication is high at this point, AIDS is more likely to progress quickly. Early treatment may reduce viral production and slow disease progression. Early treatment may also help eradicate the virus, if long-term damage to the immune system can be prevented and drug resistant strains do not develop. Martin Markowitz, of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, reports that, among 9 patients who started treatment during the initial phase of infection, viral load decreased to undetectable levels within 12 weeks. AIDS researcher David Ho estimates that from 30 weeks to 120 weeks are needed for a patient's HIV-infected cells to die out. This suggests that HIV could be eradicated from the body, if HIV replication can be completely stopped and the virus does not infect cells in areas where drugs are ineffective. Patients may have to continue drug therapy to remain disease-free, however. A patient in San Francisco was treated successfully for 80 weeks, but when he stopped treatment, his viral load quickly rebounded.

Ref: AIDS Clinical Care (09/96) Vol. 8, No. 9, P. 72; Hecht, Frederick

Comments????? UK clinical trials??

Return to Contents

OPPORTUNISTIC ILLNESS




"Antibodies to Human Herpesvirus Type 8 in the General Population and in Kaposi's Sarcoma Patients"

Human herpesvirus type 8 (HHV-8) has been detected in individuals with all forms of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), as well as HIV-seropositive individuals with and without KS, and individuals with other diseases, suggesting that the virus may be widely distributed in the population. Previous seroepidemiological studies of the virus have been hindered by unreliable tests. Evelyne T. Lennette, of Virolab in Berkeley, Calif., and colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco, used a immunofluorescence assay to measure HHV-8 seroprevalence in the general population and in KS patients and individuals at risk for HIV infection. They report that all patients with African endemic KS and 96 percent of American patients with AIDS-associated KS tested positive for HHV-8 antibodies. Additionally, 90 percent of American homosexual men with HIV tested positive, compared to 23 percent of HIV-seropositive drug users and 21 percent of HIV seropositive women. In the general U.S. population, about 25 percent of adults and 2 percent to 8 percent of children had antibodies to HHV-8. The authors say the data support the theory that HHV-8 is associated with sexual transmission, but that the rate of infection in children suggests another route of transmission exists as well.

Ref: Lancet (09/28/96) Vol. 348, No. 9031, P. 858; Lennette, Evelyne T.; Blackbourn, David J.; Levy, Jay A.

Comments?????


Return to Contents

GYNAECOLOGY




"Hormone May Raise HIV Risk in Women"

Progesterone, a hormone commonly used in oral contraceptives, has been found to increase vaginal transmission of an AIDS-like virus in monkeys and boost concentrations of the virus in their blood. Preston A. Marx of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center and colleagues report their findings in the 01/10/96 issue of the journal Nature Medicine. The study suggests that the more than 2.5 million U.S. women using progesterone contraceptives may be at increased risk for HIV infection through vaginal intercourse. The findings are not conclusive enough for the authors to recommend that women change their contraceptive, however. More research is needed to determine if the increased risk in monkeys is also present for women.

Ref: Washington Times (01/10/96) P. A9; Price, Joyce

Comments?????

Return to Contents

PAEDIATRICS




Encephalopathy Pattern Distinctive In Paediatric AIDS

A specific pattern distinguishes children with AIDS who develop central brain encephalopathy from HIV-negative children who develop cerebral atrophy from other causes, according to Dr. Victor Scarmato of Cornell University Medical College.

Dr. Scarmato and colleagues at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY compared the results of MRI examinations to determine the patterns associated with AIDS-related encephalopathy. The subjects included 9 children with progressive AIDS encephalopathy, 25 children with AIDS but without encephalopathy, 23 HIV-negative children with cerebral atrophy from other causes and 42 normal controls. He used ventricle-brain ratio, bicaudate ratio and bifrontal ratio as measures of brain atrophy.

Dr. Scarmato found that "...compared with controls, encephalopathy patients showed significantly increased bicaudate and ventricle-brain ratios, but no significant increase in bifrontal ratio, whereas children with brain atrophy from causes other than AIDS showed increases in all three ratios."

These findings support the "...predominance of 'central' atrophy in AIDS encephalopathy," and are similar to those patterns reported for adult patients with AIDS encephalopathy. The results also "...suggest a specific pattern of cerebral atrophy associated with AIDS when compared with other disease processes, a subject not addressed in previous studies." The clinical usefulness of this pattern of central brain atrophy as a diagnostic marker, or in therapeutic trials, requires further investigation, he added.

Ref: AIDS 1996;10:1227-1231.

Comments?????


Return to Contents

CURRENT OPINIONS




Reproduced from Project Inform Perspective #19 (September 1996) as part of AIDS Treatment Projects endeavour to stimulate debate on standards of care and treatment strategies. Project Inform are one of the leading treatment advocate agencies in the U.S.

Developing Long-Term Treatment Strategies

PART TWO


Strategies for Primary Infection

For someone who has reason to suspect a recent risk of infection and may have unexplained flu-like symptoms or other symptoms associated with early HIV infection, there are several options.

First check with a qualified physician and conduct an HIV PCR test and a standard HIV antibody test

Strategy A - If positive on PCR, regardless of results of the HIV antibody test, consider one of the following:


Seek out a clinical trial for people with primary HIV infection

Employ a primary infection treatment regimen: triple combination therapy. The regimen should include one high potency HIV inhibitor (protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside RT inhibitor), at least one drug known to cross the blood brain barrier (best known are AZT, d4T, and nevirapine or delavirdine), and one other drug, probably a nucleoside analogue. How long to stay on such a regimen must also be considered.

If viral load stabilises at a very low level (below 5000 copies), take your chances with waiting. Withholding therapy until later may preserve therapies for many years while delaying treatment until a time when better options, and better strategies are available. The risk, however, is that this strategy might waste the time when it would be easiest to fight the infection most aggressively with the least risk of personal harm. It might also give the virus more time to mutate on its own.


Strategy B - If negative on PCR and HIV antibody tests:


Investigate other possible causes of illness and monitor for HIV again later.

Strategies for Chronic Infection

For someone with known HIV infection for one or more years there are two general strategies, one for people beginning therapy for the first time, one for people who have already used some or most existing therapies.

Strategy A: If no prior antiviral therapy has been used, just beginning therapy.


Test twice for viral load baseline and CD4+ levels

If therapy is warranted or desired (see the International AIDS Society - US Guidelines, DocFax Issue 3):

If viral load is below 50,000, consider an initial triple combination based on nevirapine or delavirdine plus two nucleosides. To date, no lesser two-drug regimens have been proven to routinely reduce virus below the limit of detection. But it is possible that future studies will identify two-drug combinations which have this ability. Using modest two-drug regimens has little chance of adequately suppressing virus and is likely to encourage viral resistance.

If viral load is above 50,000 consider starting triple combination based on a protease inhibitor-indinavir (CrixivanÆ) or ritonavir (NorvirÆ). In this instance, it is necessary to be sure to include use of a nucleoside analogue which crosses the blood brain barrier.

Monitor for results. If viral load becomes undetectable, maintain therapy carefully and continue to monitor.

If viral load is still detectable after 12 weeks change at least two elements of the strategy.

Strategy B - If experienced with some or all older HIV therapies:


Ideally, go off any existing HIV antiviral which has been used for more than a few months.

Choose between ritonavir and indinavir (due to poor bio-availability the current formulation of saquinavir is not a valid option) as the cornerstone of therapy.

Add two new antivirals which have not been used before, including one known to cross the blood-brain barrier.

If two other new or unused therapies are not available for initiation at the same time as a protease inhibitor, consider three choices:

  • If your condition is otherwise stable and viral load is under 10,000 copies, consider waiting until two fresh drugs are available before starting the use of a protease inhibitor. From a long-term perspective, it is more important to use a drug wisely than to simply use it because it is there.

  • If you and your physician feel improved therapy is necessary, consider adding at least one other new antiviral therapy while continuing whichever other antiviral has been best tolerated and seemed most effective for you. Monitor for reduction of viral load below the limit of detection.

  • Consider including a therapy which positively affects the effectiveness of others, such as 3TC or hydroxyurea.

    Include use of an antiviral drug which crosses the blood-brain barrier.

    From Project Inform, for more information contact the Project Inform Hotline, 800-822-7422. (Toll free USA only) Project Inform, established in 1985 as a national, non-profit, community-based HIV/AIDS treatment information and advocacy organisation, serves HIV-infected individuals, their caregivers, and their healthcare and service providers.

    PART ONE OF THIS ARTICLE - strategies for primary and chronic infection was reproduced in ATPs Doctor Fax Issue 8



    Return to Contents