{"id":3480,"date":"2000-04-14T22:54:27","date_gmt":"2000-04-14T22:54:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/moomango.co.uk\/htb\/?p=3480"},"modified":"2014-07-01T13:33:28","modified_gmt":"2014-07-01T13:33:28","slug":"french-national-drug-agency-re-commends-use-of-il-2-if-haart-does-not-lead-to-an-increase-in-cd4-count-to-greater-than-200-cellsmm3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/3480","title":{"rendered":"French National Drug Agency re-commends use of IL-2 if HAART does not lead to an increase in CD4 count to greater than 200 cells\/mm3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Harvey S. Bartnof, MD, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hivandhepatitis.com\">hivandhepatitis.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>As a result of significant CD4 count benefits in the ANRS 082 Study, the French National Drug Agency has endorsed a recommendation to add interleukin-2 (IL-2, aldesleukin, ProleukinTM) to a patient&#8217;s antiretroviral drug regimen if there is not a sufficient CD4 count increase.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In some patients with later stage HIV disease, HAART does not lead to a substantial CD4 count increase, even if the HIV RNA viral load is undetectable. A count greater than 200 cells\/mm3 is needed to avoid most of the severe, life-threatening AIDS related opportunistic infections. Christine Katlama, MD, from Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere in Paris, France presented a 50-week update of Study ANRS-082 (ILSTIM) that enrolled 70 patients. [1]<\/p>\n<p>Patients entered the study if they met the following criteria: (1) CD4 count still less than 200 cells\/mm3 after six months of HAART; and (2) HIV RNA viral load controlled with a level less than 1,000 copies\/mL. A total of 70 HIV positive patients (11% women) were enrolled. They were randomised into one of two arms: (1) continue HAART for 24 weeks; or (2) continue HAART and add IL-2 4.5 million international units (MIU) self-injected subcutaneously twice daily for 5 days, every six weeks for 24 weeks (four cycles). After 24 weeks, both arms rolled over into continuing HAART and continuing (or starting) IL-2. For the arm that was taking IL-2 for the first 24 weeks, the dose after 24 weeks was raised to 9 MIU self-injected once daily, five days per week every eight weeks. The arm that first started IL-2 at 24 weeks began with a dose of 4.5 MIU self-injected once daily for five days every eight weeks for four cycles, followed by 9 MIU once daily for five days every eight weeks.<\/p>\n<p>The median baseline viral load was less than 3 log copies\/mL, while the median baseline CD4 count was approximately 145 cells\/mm3. The pre-HAART nadir (lowest) CD4 count was approximately 65 cells\/mm3. At study entry, the median time on HAART was 18 months.<\/p>\n<p>The results at week 24 revealed a significant CD4 count increase of 65 cells\/mm3 for the arm taking IL-2 plus HAART. The HAART alone arm had an increase of 18 cells\/mm3. 81% of subjects in both arms chose to remain in the study and continue beyond 24 weeks. The next interim analysis was performed at 50 weeks. At that time, the &#8216;all IL-2&#8217; group had had seven cycles, while the group who took IL-2 only after week 24 had had four cycles. At week 50, the interim CD4 count increases were 190 cells\/mm3 in the arm taking IL-2 the entire time and 120 cells\/mm3 in the arm that started IL-2 after week 24. A significant fraction of the CD4 count increases were &#8216;na\u2022ve&#8217; cells that can respond to new antigens or infections. The median viral load at 24 and 50 weeks was not specifically reported. However, the researchers did report that only 16% of the 70 patients experienced a viral load increase to greater than 1,000 copies\/mL that spontaneously decreased to less than 2,000 copies\/mL in all of them.<\/p>\n<p>Adverse events were common during IL-2 therapy and included &#8216;flu-like&#8217; symptoms that are known to occur with this drug. They included: fever 97%, fatigue 91%, muscle pain 68%, nausea 68%, runny nose or congestion 59%, sweats 41%, dry skin and\/or mouth 41%, rash 44%, joint aches 38%, insomnia 32%, and headache 25%. As a result, 14% of patients taking IL-2 had a dose decrease, while 8% discontinued IL-2. Tolerability as rated by the researchers was &#8216;quite acceptable.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The authors performed several analyses that demonstrated clear statistical benefits from IL-2 in terms of CD4 count increases. For example, the mean daily increase in CD4 counts in cells\/mm3 was 0.12 cells (per day) while not taking IL-2, compared to 0.54 cells\/mm3 (per day) while receiving IL-2. In a 6-month period, the mean CD4 increase in cells\/mm3 was calculated to be 20 while not taking IL-2 and 100 while taking IL-2. The calculated time to reach a CD4 count of 250 cells\/mm3 was three years while not taking IL-2 and six months while taking IL-2. (All analyses assumed that all patients are still taking HAART and maintained a suppressed or nearly-suppressed viral load.)<\/p>\n<p>These results demonstrate in the first randomised trial the benefits of adding IL-2 to HAART for those who do not generate a significant CD4 count increase, even with a suppressed viral load. In spite of the high rate of side effects that are known to occur with IL-2, the discontinuation rate was very low. This study is ongoing. Limitations of the study include specific numerical end-points that were not reported, as above.<\/p>\n<p>There was a similar presentation about adding low dose daily IL-2 to HAART versus HAART alone in patients with less advanced disease. Entry criteria included an undetectable viral load (limit 500 copies\/mL) for at least two months and a CD4 count that was no greater than 300 cells\/mm3. The dose used for the 115 patients in this study was 1.2 MIU per square meter self-injected once daily for six months. The lead author was Jay Lalezari, MD, from Quest Clinical Research in San Francisco, California. [2]<\/p>\n<p>The 6-month results showed an insignificant trend towards a greater CD4 count increase in the IL-2 plus HAART arm (increase of 61 cells\/mm3) when compared to the HAART alone arm (increase of 35 cells\/mm3). However, the IL-2 arm did have a significant increase in the CD4 percentage (3.6% increase) when compared to the HAART only arm (1.4% increase). Similar to the findings by Dr. Katlama in the above report, Dr. Lalezari determined that the IL-2 arm did have a higher percentage of &#8216;na\u2022ve&#8217; CD4 cells than the HAART only arm. Moreover, in the current report, it was determined that the number of Natural Killer (NK) cells were significantly increased in the IL-2 arm (+ 157 cells\/mm3), when compared to the HAART only arm (+ 20 cells\/mm3). No significant differences in plasma viral loads were noted in either group at six months.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, IL-2 appeared to block the increase in triglycerides that commonly occurs when a protease inhibitor (PI) drug is administered. Moreover, the IL-2 apparently led to a decrease in the cholesterol level that often becomes increased with the use of HAART. Adverse events were those known to occur with IL-2 (see above).<\/p>\n<p>Even considering the differences between these two studies with regard to dose of IL-2 used, dosing schedule and stage of HIV-disease, these two randomised, controlled studies add to our knowledge about the benefits of adding IL-2 to HAART in patients who have had less than optimal CD4 count increases, even with undetectable viral loads. It is noteworthy that the French National Drug Agency has endorsed using IL-2 as standard of care in this population.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hivandhepatitis.com\">hivandhepatitis.com<br \/>\n<\/a><br \/>\nReferences:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Katlama C et al. ILSTIM (ANRS 082)-a randomised comparative open-label study of interleukin (IL-2) in patients with CD4&lt;200\/mm3 despite effective HAART. Abstract and poster presentation 543 at the 7th CROI; January 30-February 2, 2000; San Francisco, CA.<\/li>\n<li>Lalezari J et al. Low-dose subcutaneous (IL-2) in combination with HAART therapy induces significant increases in NK cells and naive T-cells in patients with &lt;300 CD4+ T-cells\/mm3: results of a randomised controlled trial MA-9801. Abstract and poster presentation 381 at the 7th CROI; January 30-February 2, 2000; San Francisco, CA.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Harvey S. Bartnof, MD, hivandhepatitis.com As a result of significant CD4 count benefits in the ANRS 082 Study, the French National Drug Agency has endorsed a recommendation to add interleukin-2 (IL-2, aldesleukin, ProleukinTM) to a patient&#8217;s antiretroviral drug regimen if &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-treatment-strategies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3480"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}