{"id":37534,"date":"2020-04-17T07:52:12","date_gmt":"2020-04-17T07:52:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/?p=37534"},"modified":"2020-09-17T21:51:38","modified_gmt":"2020-09-17T21:51:38","slug":"dolutegravir-based-art-is-safe-and-effective-for-pregnant-women-first-results-from-the-vested-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/37534","title":{"rendered":"Dolutegravir-based ART is safe and effective for pregnant women: first results from the VESTED trial"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Polly Clayden, HIV i-Base<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens safe and effective when started in pregnancy \u2013 according to findings presented at CROI 2020. [1]<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

IMPAACT 2010 or VESTED <\/span>(Virologic Efficacy and Safety of Antiretroviral Therapy Combinations with TAF\/TDF, EFV and DTG)\u00a0is a phase 3, three arm, randomised, open-label trial comparing the safety and virologic efficacy of three ART regimens started by HIV positive women in pregnancy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pregnant women 14\u201328 weeks\u2019 gestation and ART-naive (up to 14 days ART in current pregnancy allowed) from nine countries were randomised to receive: <\/span>DTG + tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) + emtricitabine (FTC) vs DTG + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) + FTC vs efavirenz\u00a0 (EFV) + TDF + FTC.<\/p>\n

Women are followed for 12\u201326 weeks up to delivery and mothers and infants for 50 weeks after delivery.<\/p>\n

The study looked at whether treatment with DTG-based ART is non-inferior (-10% margin) to that with EFV (primary outcome viral load <200 copies\/mL at delivery). It also assessed superiority after establishing non-inferiority.<\/p>\n

Safety objectives included adverse pregnancy composite outcome (primary): preterm delivery (<37 weeks), small for gestational age (<10th centile), stillbirth or spontaneous abortion. The study also compared maternal and infant adverse events and neonatal death between arms.<\/span><\/p>\n

Lameck Chinula showed data for 14 days follow up postpartum in women and 28 days postpartum neonates, at CROI 2020, on behalf of the VESTED investigators. <\/span><\/p>\n

VESTED enrolled 643 women <\/span>from Botswana, Brazil, India, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, US and Zimbabwe. The majority (88%) of women were from African countries. Pregnancy outcomes were available for 640 and viral load results at delivery for 605 (94%).<\/span><\/p>\n

At baseline women were a median of 26.6 years old, gestational age of 22 weeks, CD4 count 466 cells\/mm3<\/sup> and viral load 903 copies\/mL. The majority (83%) received ART for a median of 6 days before entry, only 16% had viral load <50 copies\/mL. Median antepartum follow up was 17.4 weeks. <\/span><\/p>\n

Women in the DTG arms were significantly more likely to have viral load <200 copies\/mL at delivery than women in the EFV arm: \u00a097.5% vs 91%, risk difference 6.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 10.7), p=0.005. Women receiving DTG also had a shorter time to viral suppression, p<0.001.<\/p>\n

Fewer women in the DTG + FTC + TAF arm (24.1%) had an adverse pregnancy outcome (composite) than in the DTG + FTC + TDF (32.9%) or EFV + FTC + TDF (32.7%) arms; pairwise comparison p=0.043 and p=0.047 respectively.<\/span><\/p>\n

Preterm delivery was less frequent with DTG + FTC + TAF (5.8%) than DTG + FTC + TDF (9.4%) or EFV + FTC + TDF (12.1%, p=0.023). Small for gestational age was also less frequent with DTG + FTC + TAF (16.3%) than DTG + FTC + TDF (22.5%) or EFV + FTC + TDF (20.5%) \u2013 but none of the by arm comparisons reached statistical significance.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

Stillbirth was more frequent with DTG + FTC + TAF (3.7%) and DTG + FTC + TDF (5.2%) than EFV + FTC + TDF (1.9%); all p><\/u>0.05 (post-hoc). But neonatal death was more frequent with EFV + FTC + TDF (4.8%) than DTG + FTC + TAF (1.0%) or DTG + FTC + TDF (1.5%,); p=0.019 and p=0.053 respectively . <\/span><\/p>\n

Overall, 23.0% women and 17.0% \u00a0infants had one or more grade >3 AE; all p><\/u>0.05.<\/span><\/p>\n

Two infants were diagnosed with HIV at <14 days, one in each of the DTG arms. Maternal delivery viral loads were 58,590 and <40 copies\/mL.<\/span><\/p>\n

Maternal weight gain was significantly higher in the DTG + FTC + TAF arm than the DTG + FTC \u00a0+ TDF arm (p=0.011) or the EFV arm (p<0.001). But this was no greater than the recommended Institute of Medicine weight gain in second\/third trimesters (0.42kg\/week).<\/span><\/p>\n

The investigators concluded that all three study regimens led to high rates of viral suppression and DTG-containing regimens had superior virologic efficacy at delivery compared with EFV.<\/span><\/p>\n

DTG + FTC + TAF was associated with significantly fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes (driven by lower rates of preterm delivery and small for gestational age) and fewer neonatal deaths than EFV + FTC + TDF.<\/span><\/p>\n

They concluded that these results affirm WHO recommendations to use DTG-based ART in all populations, including pregnant women. They note that TAF might be preferable to TDF in pregnancy.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

comment<\/span><\/h3>\n

VESTED is a key ART optimisation study. So these first results from an excellent randomised controlled trial, conducted in a population that will receive WHO-recommended first-line ART, have been greatly anticipated.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The DolPHIN 2 study also showed good virological suppression with DTG-based ART among women starting treatment in pregnancy (late pregnancy \u2013 from 28 weeks\u2019 gestation). [2] <\/span><\/b>There were also more still births in this study in the DTG arm. But these were judged not related or unlikely to be related to ART.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The suggestion that TAF might be preferable to TDF in pregnancy needs to be carefully considered against the emerging data showing greater risk of weight gain \u2013 also shown in VESTED \u2013 with TAF and DTG containing ART. This seems to be more likely among black African women.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Reference\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Chinula L et al. Safety and efficacy of DTG vs EFV and TDF vs TAF in pregnancy: IMPAACT 2010 trial. Oral abstract 130LB.<\/span>
    \nhttps:\/\/www.croiconference.org\/sessions\/safety-and-efficacy-dtg-vs-efv-and-tdf-vs-taf-pregnancy-impaact-2010-trial<\/a>\u00a0(abstract)<\/span>
    \n    http:\/\/www.croiwebcasts.org\/p\/2020croi\/croi\/130<\/a>\u00a0(webcast)<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Clayden P. <\/span>Dolutegravir suppresses viral load faster than efavirenz in late pregnancy: results from DolPHIN-2. HTB. 12 March 2019.
    \n    https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/35794<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Polly Clayden, HIV i-Base Dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens safe and effective when started in pregnancy \u2013 according to findings presented at CROI 2020. [1] IMPAACT 2010 or VESTED (Virologic Efficacy and Safety of Antiretroviral Therapy Combinations with TAF\/TDF, EFV and DTG)\u00a0is …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,35],"tags":[277],"class_list":["post-37534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conference-reports","category-pmtct-and-maternal-health","tag-croi-2020"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}