{"id":4804,"date":"2001-09-01T15:08:17","date_gmt":"2001-09-01T14:08:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/moomango.co.uk\/htb\/?p=4804"},"modified":"2014-06-11T17:03:16","modified_gmt":"2014-06-11T17:03:16","slug":"drug-companies-spending-on-advertising-double-research-and-development-spending-in-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/4804","title":{"rendered":"Drug companies’ spending on advertising double research and development spending in 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"

The nation\u2019s [US] leading drug companies last year spent nearly twice as much on advertising alone as on research and development, and nearly three times more on advertising, administration and executive compensation, according to a study released Tuesday by Families USA, a not-for-profit health care consumer group.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The AP\/Arizona Republic reports that the group said that the study\u2019s findings disputed the industry\u2019s \u201ccontentions\u201d that the high cost of research and development has led to the recent rise in prescription drug costs, an argument that has also been used to justify the high cost of HIV\/AIDS drugs, especially in developing countries (AP\/Arizona Republic, 11\/07).<\/p>\n

The group analysed annual reports for fiscal year 2000 submitted by nine drug makers to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The companies \u2014 Merck, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, Abbott Laboratories, American Home Products, Eli Lilly, Schering-Plough, and Allergan \u2014 were selected because they produced the 50 most frequently prescribed drugs for seniors.<\/p>\n

Sugar coating<\/h2>\n

The study found that each of the nine companies except Eli Lilly spent more than double the amount on marketing, administration and advertising compared to research and development (Lilly spent 1.5 times the amount), while six of the nine \u201cmade more money in net profits than they spent on research and development last year.\u201d<\/p>\n

Merck, for example, produced $40.4 billion in revenue last year \u2014 net profits represented 17% of this figure, 15% was spent on marketing, advertising or administration, and 6% was allocated on research and development, the latter percentage being the lowest of the nine companies. In percentage terms, Lilly spent the most of any company on research and development, 19%, while also seeing the largest net income at 28%.<\/p>\n

The report also found \u201cprofligate spending on compensation packages\u201d for pharmaceutical executives. For instance, excluding \u201cunexercised stock options,\u201d Pfizer Chair William Steere received a compensation package of $40.2 million last year. \u201cPharmaceutical companies charging skyrocketing drug prices like to sugar coat the pain by saying those prices are needed for research and development,\u201d Ron Pollack, Families USA\u2019s executive director, said, adding, \u201cThe truth is high prices are much more associated with record-breaking profits and enormous compensation for top drug company executives\u201d.<\/p>\n

Profits for people<\/h2>\n

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America criticized the study, saying that the report\u2019s \u201ccondemn[ation]\u201d of drug makers was \u201cunfair,\u201d the AP\/Republic reports. PhRMA spokesperson Jackie Cottrell said, \u201cWhen the pharmaceutical industry does well, patients do even better.\u201d She also cited industry figures showing that about $8 billion of the $15.7 billion that drug makers spent on marketing in 2000 was attributable to companies giving away free drug samples. \u201cThe system works \u2014 for patients. Because the pharmaceutical industry is profitable, Americans have the best chance in the world of getting the cure for Alzheimer\u2019s, cancer, diabetes or AIDS,\u201d Cottrell added (AP\/Arizona Republic, 11\/07).<\/p>\n

Source: Kaiser Network Daily HIV\/AIDS Report<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.kaisernetwork.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The nation\u2019s [US] leading drug companies last year spent nearly twice as much on advertising alone as on research and development, and nearly three times more on advertising, administration and executive compensation, according to a study released Tuesday by Families …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-treatment-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4804\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-base.info\/htb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}