NIAID funds 9-year, 6,000-participant study to look at how best to use antiretrovirals
10 March 2002. Related: Antiretrovirals.
A critical long-term study to determine which of two common HIV treatment strategies ultimately is better began in January at 21 United States locations and several sites in Australia. SMART, or Strategies for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapies, will eventually enrol 6,000 people who will be monitored for up to nine years.
The study is being conducted by the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA), a network of community-based researchers funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
People with HIV and their doctors can take one of two approaches when tackling the disease. They may either suppress the virus as much as possible from the outset by continually using strong antiviral drugs or delay drug therapy until CD4+ T cells fall below a critical level.
“There is no doubt that people living with HIV/AIDS have benefited greatly from the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and other advances during the mid-1990s,” notes Anthony S Fauci MD, director of NIAID. “However, it is also undeniable that these powerful drugs cause serious side effects,” he adds. “To strike a balance between adequately aggressive treatment and minimal adverse side effects, we need hard data. SMART promises to provide just that kind of information to physicians and their patients,” Dr Fauci says.
HIV/AIDS treatment guidelines developed in the mid-1990s favoured the “hit-hard-early” strategy. In the short term, this strategy often leads to a less debilitating course of AIDS. As a result, death and disability from HIV/AIDS have declined sharply in the United States and other developed countries.
However, the drug regimens are expensive, difficult to follow and frequently cause a host of serious side effects after long-term use. Moreover, HIV may become resistant to one or more of the drugs, thereby making them ineffective. For these reasons, current HIV treatment guidelines do not recommend starting HAART as early as former guidelines did.
“There are many unanswered questions about the most appropriate use of anti-viral therapy,” says Karin Klingman MD, a medical officer in NIAID’s Division of AIDS and member of the SMART protocol team. “We simply do not know when the best time is to begin therapy after infection; when to switch from one treatment to another; or which of several key factors best predicts how the disease will progress.” It is hoped SMART will answer these questions.
SMART differs from previous AIDS treatment clinical trials in several ways. For example, although the effectiveness and toxicity of various anti-HIV therapies have been studied, this is the first study to do so over a prolonged period. SMART will compare two distinct treatment approaches and will follow enrolees for an average of seven years. In addition, while most AIDS treatment trials measure indirect indicators of AIDS development, such as the amount of virus or number of CD4+ T cells in the blood, SMART will measure clinical events such as progression to full-blown disease or to death, which take longer to occur. “The study’s length is one reason for our great emphasis on patient and physician education both prior to enrolment and throughout the study,” says Dr Klingman. SMART’s enrolment criteria are broad — teenagers as well as adults are eligible — so the findings will be applicable to as many people as possible, she adds.
In the first year, study investigators will enrol 1,000 HIV-infected people and randomly assign them to either a “go-slow” or a “hit-hard-early” treatment strategy. The hit-hard-early strategy (in which drugs are used to suppress HIV levels to low or undetectable levels) is recommended in guidelines employed by many physicians in the United States. Study participants in the go-slow arm of the study will agree not to take antiviral drugs unless their CD4+ T-cell count drops below 250 per cubic millimetre (mm3), and then they will take the drugs only until their CD4+ T-cell counts rebound above 350. The long-term feasibility of the study will be evaluated after the first year. Based on a favourable outcome, an additional 5,000 people will be enrolled over the next three years.
To take advantage of the wealth of information predicted to come from such a large and lengthy trial, the SMART study will incorporate several substudies. One, which examines treatment effects on the heart, is the first of its kind. Another will examine whether and how treatment changes body fat distribution and bone density — significant side effects of HAART — in enrolees in each group.
“Reliable evidence from randomised trials is needed to assess the risks and benefits of the strategies evaluated in SMART. The successful completion of this study will provide ground-breaking information on how to approach treatment of HIV disease,” says Wafaa El-Sadr MD MPH, a principal investigator and co-chair with James Neaton PhD, of the SMART study team.
Source: NIAID Press Release
Contact information for the CPCRA units involved in the SMART trial is available at:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
(search term “smart”). Additional information about AIDS clinical trials and how to enrol in studies is available at the AIDS Clinical Trials Information Service (ACTIS) Web site:
http://www.actis.org http://www.actis.org/
or 1-800-874-2572 (1-800-TRIALS-A).