Question
What are the different HIV tests?
16 January 2023. Related: All topics, HIV testing.
Answer
There are three types of tests that can be used to diagnose HIV.
i) 3rd generation antibody-only tests.
These tests have window period 6-8 weeks after any risk. They include most rapid, Tri-Dot and Centaur tests. Self-testing tests usually only test for antibody.
The most common test for HIV is an antibody test. This tests for a persons immune response to having come into contact with HIV. An antibody is a protein produced by your body when it recognises an infection.
The main antibody test is called ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay). If blood tested is from a finger prick, then ‘rapid’ tests can give the results in 10-30 minutes. If the blood is taken with a syringe, it is usually then sent to a lab, and results can take anything from a few hours to a few weeks, depending on the urgency of the sample, and procedures of that clinic.
If this result is negative or non-reactive, then you are HIV negative (allowing for the window period – see below).
If the result is positive, this does not mean that you are HIV positive. It means you need a second confirmatory test. A small percentage of people can test positive with ELISA who are not HIV-positive (called a ‘false-positive’ result).
All positive results need to be confirmed by a second, more sensitive antibody test called western blot. The western blot test takes longer (usually a week or so) and is the most accurate at identifying genuine positive results. When it is used to confirm a positive result the western blot test is 100% accurate.
HIV antibody tests do not work as soon as you are infected. This is because it usually takes several weeks to generate antibodies to HIV. This is called the ‘window period’. Most people generate this response within 4–6 weeks, but approximately 5% of people take up to 3 months. Very rarely it can take longer.
The result of an antibody tests therefore only tells your your HIV status three months prior to the test. This is why people are advised to re-test three months after the exposure if you test at 4-6 weeks, or to wait three months before taking an HIV test.
Taking an antibody test less than 4 weeks after exposure will not tell you very much. You need to wait until at least 4–6 weeks after the exposure.
You then need to confirm a negative result with a second test three months after the exposure.
This confirmatory test is to cover the small chance (less than 5%) that you may not have developed an antibody response this early.
A modified ELISA tests called RITA (Recent Infection Testing Algorithm) can indicate whether the infection is likely to have been in the previous six months. Detuned means that the test has been modified, so that it is less sensitive.
It is provided to every NHS clinic free by the public health laboratory based in Colindale. In the UK this is recommended with every positive HIV test. The results given a good indication that the infection is recent but are not a guarantee. This is now referred to as RITA .
RITA used to be called STARHS (Serological Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion). A technical review of STARHS is at this link.
ii) 4th generation combined antibody/antigen tests and p24 antigen tests (ie Duo tests) – window period: 3–6 weeks after exposure (UK clinics generally say 6 weeks).
Some HIV tests combine an antibody (Ab) test with an antigen (Ag) test.
An antigen is a name for genetic material caused by a virus or other infection. In these tests the antigen being tested is p24 (protein 24), a major protein that is part of HIV.
p24 is detected 2–3 weeks after infection – before antibodies are produced, but not really afterwards – and p24 levels only stay high for the next 1–2 months.
p24 antigen tests can be used 3–4 weeks after exposure – so can give an earlier result than an antibody test. The are combined with antigen tests because the window period that p24 is detected is very short.
As with antibody tests, a small percentage of people may have a delayed response to HIV so people using this test four weeks after any potential exposure are routinely recommended to confirm a negative result three months later.
iii) Viral load tests (PCR RNA and DNA)
These tests have a window period from 1–4 weeks after exposure. However, they are not approved to diagnose HIV.
Viral load tests are also called PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests. They either test for HIV RNA or HIV DNA.
Rather than look for an immune response, they look directly for HIV, usually in a blood sample. In a new infection, viral load can reach very high levels within a few weeks of infection. More rarely this can be within if few days.
Viral load tests are not approved for diagnosing HIV testing.
However, viral load tests are sometimes used in specific circumstances. This is usually after a very high risk or traumatic risk, especially if several symptoms suggest seroconversion. In the presence of symptoms, a negative viral load test is useful. It can rule out HIV because symptoms caused by HIV seroconversion would by definition need viral load to be both high and detectable. A negative viral load test can reduce initial anxiety and worry until an HIV antigen test can confirm there is no infection.
Viral load test are neither approved or recommended for routine HIV testing by people who just want to test more quickly than the four weeks recommended with an antigen/antibody test. They are less accurate (actual infections can easily be missed), more expensive and require more complicated laboratory technology.
After infection, viral load is usually very high within the first 1–2 weeks, and so this test can be usbloed to confirm a suspected early infection.
In adults, viral load tests look for RNA and are only usually done when there is both:
- A history of recent high risk exposure (ie condom break an HIV positive partner who is not on treatment); and
- Symptoms consistent with HIV seroconversion (fever, extreme tiredness, heavy ‘flu-like illness etc).
Viral load tests are also used in babies born to HIV positive mothers, and test for DNA.
This is important to know to decide on whether the baby needs early treatment. Because a baby carries his or her mothers anitbodies for the first two years, antibody testing is not useful until a child is around two years old.
Note: This answer was updated in 2011, 2018 and 2023 from an original post in January 2008.
I appreciate and feedback given. I had unprotected sex back on September 9th 2011 whilst on holiday with a 21 year old female student. We were both extremely drunk and this didn’t last long. The next day when I came back to England from my
Holiday I met up with a mutual friend. She came back to mine and we had protected sex for approx 20 mins. However, she for sum reason ‘accidentally’ takes the condom off but I didn’t know at the time and I continued to penetrate for less then 5 mins until I felt no condom. I do not know the status of these two women.
In late Oct, (7 weeks after poss exposure)I developed a slight fever lasting no longer then two days, night sweats for one night, tiredness, sore throat, muscle aches. Nearly all the ars symptoms! I went for a STD test on that week, came back positive for chlaymidia but negative everything else. In the gym few days later I noticed my lymph nodes in my groin either side are slightly swollen, not too much and they don’t hurt. I also found by my belly button 7 or so red small blotches. U can imagine my anxiety now. Went for a rapid HIV test at 8 weeks-negative. Doctor also did not think my blotches resembled that of a HIV rash. I will test again at the 3 month window early December.
1.do u think given what I’ve told u n the symptoms I’ve explained that I’m likely to
Test positive for HIV?
2. Can the treatment that I had for chlyamidia affect the 8 week rapid HIV test?
3. Is it possible for my chlaymidia infection to have caused the slightly swollen lymph nodes in my groin?
All my symptoms just seem too coincidental to be anything else but HIV. I can’t sleep properly at night and concentrate at work. Worst few months of my life. Appreciate the feedback.
At one month this test will pick up 95% of infections. A confirmatory test is needed at month three will pick up more than 99.99% of infections.
Your answer on accuracy of tests at 4 weeks is on the FAQ page here.
Hi sir, i want 2 know that is tridot test reliable after 01 mnth of exposure.
Your answer on accuracy of tests at 4 weeks is on the FAQ page here. It is good that your results so far are negative. A test at week 4 will pick up 95% of infections and a test at week 12 will pick up 99.99%. A test between will be somewhere between these figures.
I recently had a condom slip while having sex with a women in Mozambique, It was only 3 – 5 minutes or until i ejaculated when i found out that it had slipped. I went to the bathroom where i rinsed it and ended our encounter. After two weeks i decided to do an ELISA duo test at the local clinic and it came back negative. After 6 – 7 weeks i did another test and it came back false positive. What are the chances that i am infected?, after such an incidence.
The three month test is need because some people take three months to develop antibodies. If this was the case and you went away thinking you were definitely negative, you might infect other people.
Hi Simon;
I know CDC still recommends 3 months window period; also Health Ministry in South Africa; but have you ever saw negative 6 weeks turn positive later? The whole thing I blv is causin unnecessary anxiety; I blv that the research was conducted on the high risk ppl and almost all tested positive between 6-8 weeks; why can’t CDC reduce window period to 8 weeks instead!!
You need to have a test at 4 weeks and then again at 12 weeks. Just because your partner was positive does not mean you will catch HIV. The risks from one exposure are low. You are still likely to be HIV negative but need the tests to know this.
Taking Truvada this long after the exposure will bot have any impact of reducing the risk.
Thanks for your reply. For two days I’ve been taking Truvada. Will this help to reduce the risk of having hiv ,or will it clear it out if the intercourse took place in 2 weeks,without ejaculation.
2 weeks back I slept with an HIV pos man and I was negative but he didn’t come inside. Today I went to do rapid test and syringe test for lab. The rapid test came back negative,does that mean if the lab test comes back negative I won’t have to worry about having HIV in my body. Very scared.